Add flake8-simplicity rules
This commit is contained in:
parent
d7d1f42b2c
commit
6b1e40f689
7 changed files with 38 additions and 49 deletions
|
|
@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ select = [
|
|||
"PT", # pytest linting
|
||||
"RET", # Consistent clear return statements
|
||||
"RSE", # Raise parentheses
|
||||
# "SIM", # Simplifications detected
|
||||
"SIM", # Simplifications detected
|
||||
"ARG", # unused arguments
|
||||
"C90", # McCabe complexity!
|
||||
"NPY", # Numpy linting
|
||||
|
|
@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ ignore = [
|
|||
# magic (such as 255 when doing uint8 maths)
|
||||
"PT011", # Ifnore pytest.raises being used on too gereneral expectations without a
|
||||
# match. We may need to revisit this.
|
||||
"SIM105", # Not enforcing use of `contextlib.suppress(NotConnectedToServerError)`
|
||||
# instead of `try`-`except`-`pass`
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
[tool.ruff.lint.per-file-ignores]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -210,8 +210,7 @@ class ScanDirectoryManager:
|
|||
not exist.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
file_path = os.path.join(self.path_for(scan_name), filename)
|
||||
if check_exists:
|
||||
if not os.path.exists(file_path):
|
||||
if check_exists and not os.path.exists(file_path):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
return file_path
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -225,8 +224,7 @@ class ScanDirectoryManager:
|
|||
then the path is returned anyway
|
||||
"""
|
||||
file_path = os.path.join(self.img_dir_for(scan_name), filename)
|
||||
if check_exists:
|
||||
if not os.path.exists(file_path):
|
||||
if check_exists and not os.path.exists(file_path):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
return file_path
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -528,7 +526,8 @@ class ScanDirectory:
|
|||
"""
|
||||
zip_fname = os.path.join(self.dir_path, "images.zip")
|
||||
|
||||
if os.path.isfile(zip_fname):
|
||||
# Use noqa as converting this into a 1 liner is not more readable.
|
||||
if os.path.isfile(zip_fname): # noqa: SIM108
|
||||
# get a list of files in the existing zip
|
||||
zip_files = get_files_in_zip(zip_fname)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -163,10 +163,7 @@ class ScanPlanner:
|
|||
|
||||
# If focussed locations exist return closest location, favouring most recent
|
||||
closest_pos = self.closest_focus_site(next_location)
|
||||
if closest_pos is None:
|
||||
z = None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
z = closest_pos[2]
|
||||
z = None if closest_pos is None else closest_pos[2]
|
||||
|
||||
return next_location, z
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -363,10 +360,7 @@ class SmartSpiral(ScanPlanner):
|
|||
|
||||
# If focused locations exist, return the neighbour with the lowest z position
|
||||
closest_pos = self.select_nearby_focus_site(next_location)
|
||||
if closest_pos is None:
|
||||
z = None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
z = closest_pos[2]
|
||||
z = None if closest_pos is None else closest_pos[2]
|
||||
|
||||
return next_location, z
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -165,9 +165,7 @@ class PreviewStitcher(BaseStitcher):
|
|||
with self._popen_lock:
|
||||
if self._popen_obj is None:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if self._popen_obj.poll() is None:
|
||||
return True
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return self._popen_obj.poll() is None
|
||||
|
||||
def wait(self, cancel: lt.deps.CancelHook) -> None:
|
||||
"""Wait for this preview stitch to return.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -334,8 +334,7 @@ class SmartScanThing(lt.Thing):
|
|||
"""Manage the stitching threads, starting them if needed and not already running."""
|
||||
# Assume 4 images means at least one offset in x and y, making the stitching
|
||||
# well constrained.
|
||||
if self._scan_data.image_count > 3:
|
||||
if not self._preview_stitcher.running:
|
||||
if self._scan_data.image_count > 3 and not self._preview_stitcher.running:
|
||||
self._preview_stitcher.start()
|
||||
|
||||
@_scan_running
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ def test_no_warnings_if_correct_permissions(caplog):
|
|||
"""
|
||||
# Reset handler at start of test
|
||||
ofm_logging.OFM_HANDLER = ofm_logging.OFMHandler()
|
||||
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING):
|
||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmpdir:
|
||||
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING), tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmpdir:
|
||||
ofm_logging.configure_logging(tmpdir)
|
||||
assert len(caplog.records) == 0
|
||||
with open(ofm_logging.OFM_LOG_FILE, "r", encoding="utf-8") as log_file:
|
||||
|
|
@ -41,8 +40,7 @@ def test_permission_error_raises_warning(mocker, caplog):
|
|||
)
|
||||
# Reset handler at start of test
|
||||
ofm_logging.OFM_HANDLER = ofm_logging.OFMHandler()
|
||||
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING):
|
||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmpdir:
|
||||
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING), tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmpdir:
|
||||
ofm_logging.configure_logging(tmpdir)
|
||||
assert len(caplog.records) == 1
|
||||
# Check OFM logger is added even if the file logger couldn't be.
|
||||
|
|
@ -54,8 +52,7 @@ def test_making_log_dir(caplog):
|
|||
"""Check that configure_logging will make a dir if needed."""
|
||||
# Reset handler at start of test
|
||||
ofm_logging.OFM_HANDLER = ofm_logging.OFMHandler()
|
||||
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING):
|
||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmpdir:
|
||||
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING), tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmpdir:
|
||||
log_dir = os.path.join(tmpdir, "new_dir")
|
||||
assert not os.path.isdir(log_dir)
|
||||
ofm_logging.configure_logging(log_dir)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ def test_enforce_xy_tuple():
|
|||
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
|
||||
scan_planners.enforce_xy_tuple(value)
|
||||
|
||||
assert (1, 6) == scan_planners.enforce_xy_tuple((1, 6))
|
||||
assert (1, 6) == scan_planners.enforce_xy_tuple([1, 6])
|
||||
assert scan_planners.enforce_xy_tuple((1, 6)) == (1, 6)
|
||||
assert scan_planners.enforce_xy_tuple([1, 6]) == (1, 6)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_enforce_xyz_tuple():
|
||||
|
|
@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ def test_enforce_xyz_tuple():
|
|||
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
|
||||
scan_planners.enforce_xyz_tuple(value)
|
||||
|
||||
assert (1, 6, 2) == scan_planners.enforce_xyz_tuple((1, 6, 2))
|
||||
assert (1, 6, 6) == scan_planners.enforce_xyz_tuple([1, 6, 6])
|
||||
assert scan_planners.enforce_xyz_tuple((1, 6, 2)) == (1, 6, 2)
|
||||
assert scan_planners.enforce_xyz_tuple([1, 6, 6]) == (1, 6, 6)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_base_class_not_implemented():
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue